…by Jonas E. Alexis and Henry Makow

Henry Makow has a Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982 and is the author of the best-selling book Cruel Hoax: Feminism & the New World Order. Makow grew up in a Jewish family.

Makow has been completely misrepresented by thought-police organizations such as the Southern Poverty Law Center. “The elite operates by fostering division and conflict in the world,” he says. “Thus, we don’t realize who the real enemy is. Idealists in my parent’s generation were disillusioned when the Communist dream of universal brotherhood turned out to be a snare.”

Jonas E. Alexis: People tend to forget the Dreyfus Affair. Dreyfus was a French artillery officer who was accused of espionage in 1894, at a time when, according to Alfred S. Lindemann of the University of California, “anti-Semitism was at a low ebb.”[1]

Yet that did not stop Dreyfus’s supporters (known as Dreyfusards) from bringing the issue of anti-Semitism into the affair as the motive behind Dreyfus’s accusation:

“But the first major history of the Affair, written by Joseph Reinach, himself Jewish and a leading Dreyfusard, provides a lurid picture of the role of conspiratorial, reactionary anti-Semites in the military. The most popular account of the Affair in English, by Nicholas Halasz, also Jewish, followed Reinach’s lead in describing Dreyfus’s arrest as unquestionably motivated by anti-Semitism.”[2]

…from Russia Today, Moscow

[ Editor’s Note: The gloves came off with John Kerry spilling the beans on how America’s wonderful corrupt allies view us as a “rent-a-bombing” service when they don’t like a country. The word sociopaths was invented for people like this.

I don’t usually get into predicting the future, but I sense a move here by Kerry to maybe run against Trump. I think he would beat him in a paper ballot, but with the voting machines it would be difficult.

But the best revelation is at the end below, Kerry revealing that the Iran missile restrictions were supposed to be out of the JCPOA deal, but Samantha Powers slipped them back in without anyone noticing, and incredible bomb to drop. Somebody really screwed up there.

I can’t want to see if any media folks are banging on her door tomorrow for a comment. Gosh, I wonder who might have gotten to her to pull that stunt, or what little country?  It sounds like an Intel Op to me. Don’t be surprised if Kerry has more juicy disclosures like this in the pipeline.

There has been no word of his lobbying Congress to not to screw up the Iran deal with new sanctions. There should be no reason for him not to if he wanted, as he is still a citizen last I heard. Ain’t it great to live in a free country and be ruled over like you were in an occupied one sometimes … Jim W. Dean ]

Les resten / Read more:

…by Jonas E. Alexis

William Binney is a former intelligence official with National Security Agency (NSA). He is also a mathematician. He has recently grabbed the Neocon and Zionist gangsters by the horn and declared that “Russiagate” is complete crap. He said:

“If the idiots in the intelligence community expect us to believe them after all the crap they have told us (like WMD’s in Iraq and ‘no we don’t collect data on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans’) then they need to give clear proof of what they say. So far, they have failed to prove anything.”

That certainly is fair enough. You simply cannot make an outrageous accusation and then leave the scene without providing an iota of evidence. If you ask Mr. X for the evidence that the Russiagate thing is legitimate, he would respond by saying Mr. Y has it; when you ask Mr. Y, he says Mr. Z has it; when you ask Mr. Z, he says Mr. X has it. The Neocons and Zionist ethnic cleansers have been playing this game for quite a long time. They think that positing an assertion and repeating it over and over again somehow is evidence for the assertion itself.

Binney certainly nailed it precisely because the same Russiagate people are the ones who bled the Middle East to death. Remember what happened in Iraq again? As former CIA officer Paul R. Pillar put it,

“The [Bush] administration realized that a tremendous, noholds-barred sales job was needed to persuade the American public to support a departure from a tradition of nonaggression…The [WMD] campaign was supported by a relentless effort to dig up whatever bits of reporting could be construed as showing that Iraq was an immediate threat.”[1]

In 2001, William Kristol, Francis Fukuyama, Norman Podhoretz, Bill Bennett, Aaron Friedberg, Nicholas Eberstadt, Rudy Boshwitz, Martin Peretz, Stephen P. Rosen, Richard Perle, Henry Sokolski, Donald Kagan, among twenty-eight other neoconservatives, sent a letter to President Bush making a similar request. The letter stated in part:

Les resten / Read more:

by Alexander Orlov,  …with New Eastern Outlook, Moscow

[ Editor’s Note: I had seen the Charlie Rose interview with former Qatari PM and FM Hamad Bin Jassim but missed the BBC one that Orlov’s article covers below. It reveals the $137 billion that the US coalition spent to topple Syria, an astounding figure, and of course all debt funded onto the backs of future Americans.

As for the revolt back at home over all this, it never happened. Distractions galore have overseas concerns at the bottom of most people’s lists, so that is where a lot of low risk looting goes on.

Orlov’s figures on the bribes paid to Syrian officer defectors are in line, but the $50 million paid by the Saudis for ex-Syrian PM Riyad Farid Hijab’s defection seems overly generous. If true, one can imagine the bitterness of the Saudis and hence their wanting to blame Iran, but you notice you hear no condemnation against Russia’s assistance, which was the tipping point in the war.

And of course none of the EU countries, despite NATO being involved in the Syrian take down, with the old Mid East colonialists leading the way, are following Saudi Arabia’s lead in the new Iran bogeyman push. They are racing to get a piece of the Iranian rebuilding contracts and holding tight on the JCPOA deal, too.

Surprise, surprise…they are caught playing both sides against the middle once again, selling arms to the Saudis to pummel the poor Yeminis while doing business with Iran. Even N.Korea has gotten more PR savvy, saying its nukes are only for the US, and because they don’t want to get the “Libya treatment”, but which last I remember that was a NATO deal, too… Jim W. Dean ]

Les resten / Read more:

[Editor’s note: The tragic deaths of at least 26 people in San Antonio, TX, while attending church on Sunday is most likely nothing more than a cruel and hyper-cynical attempt at distracting the US public’s gaze from the rapidly approaching indictment and take down of figures very close to the heart of the Trump administration in Manafort and Flynn, men whom VT had identified as utterly corrupt foreign assets months ago.

See our May 2017 article below, it is a veritable Tour De Force and has just become crucially important to what is by far the most important news story right now.

You see, if the FBI and Bob Mueller have enough to take down Manafort and Flynn, then they must have enough to take down Trump too; we think that Mueller is attempting to leverage Trump into a face saving resignation by indicting Manafort and Flynn, a clear warning to Trump that he is going to be likewise indicted, if he doesn’t resign first.

A resignation would suit the US establishment that opposes Trump just as much as it would suit the international Kosher Nostra mafia that is behind the Trump presidency; for both parties, it would allow a whole bunch of extremely uncomfortable secrets to be kept under wraps.

Clearly, this affair has the potential to torpedo and sink the Trump presidency, therefore the slaughtering of a bunch of white Christian folk as a cynical distraction – they are getting desperate as they know they are wounded, their blood is in the water and the sharks are beginning to circle. Ian]

Les resten: